Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: KISS Love Gun discontinued!

  1. #11
    Peter Peeker
    Guest Peter Peeker's Avatar

    Post

    although it does suck that we won't get the sets at that price, I can't blame the store for not wanting to take a bath over a typo.

    and they would. big time.

    if the old KISS sets retail for $100 here(w/4 figs), I'd hate to see what the 7 fig set will be...

  2. #12
    Inactive Member Andyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2004
    Posts
    13,640
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I can't believe some of you people actually thought you going to get away with that price on the Kiss boxset. Get real. You tried to beat the system and you lost. Live with it.

  3. #13
    Inactive Member sculpey's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 22nd, 2001
    Posts
    8,165
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    I have mine on order from Kim, even though I have absolutely nowhere to put it.

  4. #14
    Inactive Member Tr3s's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 25th, 2004
    Posts
    1,280
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by Andyman:
    I can't believe some of you people actually thought you going to get away with that price on the Kiss boxset. Get real. You tried to beat the system and you lost. Live with it.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I tried hammering that little tidbit back at the old homestead, but people can be so unbelievably naive or so desperate for a bargain that they refuse to see common sense and just jump into the stupid fray. And now they get angry when the cnady was snatched back? Oh well...human nature, I guess. Live and learn, boys.

  5. #15
    Inactive Member Genetic Disposition's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 4th, 2004
    Posts
    666
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by sculpey:
    I have mine on order from Kim, even though I have absolutely nowhere to put it.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I got the Alive boxed set a while back, mostly because it was $25.00. I will have to move to a bigger house just to find a place for that one. I'll have to pass on this...

  6. #16
    Peter Peeker
    Guest Peter Peeker's Avatar

    Post

    Originally posted by sculpey:
    I have mine on order from Kim, even though I have absolutely nowhere to put it.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have some extra space.
    sadly, it's between my ears...

  7. #17
    Inactive Member DARTH POOH's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 15th, 2004
    Posts
    3,327
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Wink

    I missed it..How much was it at SBP??

  8. #18
    Inactive Member Andyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2004
    Posts
    13,640
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by DARTH POOH:
    I missed it..How much was it at SBP??
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">They had it listed at $12.99. It was obviously a mistake.

  9. #19
    Inactive Member Slytherin Snape's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 28th, 2004
    Posts
    3,650
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Exclamation

    Originally posted by Andyman:
    I can't believe some of you people actually thought you going to get away with that price on the Kiss boxset. Get real. You tried to beat the system and you lost. Live with it.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well Andyman, this is the way I see it. From an ethical point of view it was arguably "wrong" to try and order the set from SBP at that price since it was "known" to be the wrong price. However, if you walk into a store and an item has a price tag clearly affixed to it (actually on the item CCat, not just jeans thrown on the sale table [img]wink.gif[/img] ) the store is obligated to sell you the item for that price. It was the store's fault for marking it improperly.

    I don't see where that principle of retail "changes" just because the store is an online store instead of a brick and mortar store. SBP priced the set at $12.99. This was something they had to deliberately do in listing it on their site. Further, it's not like a ton of people crashed the place and ordered in just a few hours, or even a day or two. SBP left the set listed on their site at that price for approximately 11 days! Too bad for them if they didn't catch it sooner. Poor business practice on their part.

    And now they have compounded their error with the way they have handled their screw up. They could have been honest with their customers and admitted they screwed up and offered people the option to either keep the pre-order at the higher price if they wanted or to cancel the order. Instead, SBP has fraudulently canceled people's orders by lying in their emails that the reason for the cancellation was that the item had been discontinued, when they know very well that it has not been.

    Add to that SBP's complaints to TMP about people ordering at that price and their collusion with TMP to get all threads on the BBs dealing with this situation pulled, and SBP has opened themselves up to a world of trouble if people feel motivated enough to make it.

    Just my two cents. [img]tongue.gif[/img] [img]wink.gif[/img]

    *and just for the record, I hadn't ordered from them*

    <font color="#cd6600" size="1">[ May 07, 2004 03:26 PM: Message edited by: Slytherin Snape ]</font>

  10. #20
    Inactive Member Andyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2004
    Posts
    13,640
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Angry

    Yes, my fault for assuming people (least of all lawyers) have "ethics". So sue me. [img]wink.gif[/img]

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •